Re: wrong number of arguments (Re: void-variable deactivate-mark)

[Kevin Greiner <kgreiner@xpediantsolutions.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1460 bytes --]

Reiner,
I'd appreciate it if you would try the following (Right now, you're the 
only one who is reliably producing this particular problem).  First, 
reinstall the 6.43 revision of gnus-sum.el.  Then apply this patch.
diff -r6.243 gnus-sum.el
11200c11200,11201
<      (all nil)
---
 >      (all 
 >       (setq older (gnus-uncompress-range older)))

Kevin

Reiner Steib wrote:

>On Tue, Nov 26 2002, Kai Großjohann wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>While compiling Gnus CVS, the byte-compiler warns as follows:
>>>
>>>While compiling gnus-summary-insert-old-articles in file [...]gnus-sum.el:
>>>  ** gnus-range-difference called with 1 argument, but requires 2
>>>Wrote /Work/gnus/lisp/gnus-sum.elc
>>>      
>>>
>[...]
>  
>
>>Better now?
>>    
>>
>
>Sorry, not for me. When I call `/ o' I get the following backtrace:
>
>,----[ `/ o' with revision 6.243 of gnus-sum.el ]
>| Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument
>| number-or-marker-p (121011 . 121196))
>|   gnus-sorted-difference(((121011 . 121196)) (121197 121198 121199))
>|   gnus-summary-insert-articles(((121011 . 121196)))
>|   gnus-summary-insert-old-articles(nil)
>| * call-interactively(gnus-summary-insert-old-articles)
>`----
>
>When I replace `gnus-summary-insert-articles' and
>`gnus-summary-insert-old-articles' with the versions from revision
>6.238 (the one before the changes in the agent code) it works fine.
>
>Bye, Reiner.
>  
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2187 bytes --]