From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38571 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Piper Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: How to help debug numerous crashes of 21.4.4 on Windows? Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:49:29 -0700 Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010903204333.00b2ce70@san-francisco.beasys.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010903190017.00b43aa0@san-francisco.beasys.com> <8zfwxo6t.fsf@oce.orst.edu> <86u1ylpe0a.fsf@earthlink.net> <1ylpz61s.fsf@oce.orst.edu> <15250.55083.448859.484206@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4.3.2.7.2.20010903190017.00b43aa0@san-francisco.beasys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174413 23222 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:26:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 5776 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 03:52:55 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO beamail.beasys.com) (63.96.163.102) by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 03:52:55 -0000 Original-Received: from san-francisco.beasys.com (san-francisco.beasys.com [192.168.9.10]) by beamail.beasys.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA05325; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from shalom.bea.com (wsp001327wss.beasys.com [192.168.6.158]) by san-francisco.beasys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA01785; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:54:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender: andyp@san-francisco.beasys.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Original-To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" In-Reply-To: <15252.17836.650867.630970@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Original-Lines: 22 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38571 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38571 At 12:08 PM 9/4/01 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Cleaned ccs; leaving ding. > > Andy> Can you point me at the 21.5 change that is supposed to deal > Andy> with this? Thanks > >http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-patches/200106/msg00029.html > >Here's the relevant part of the ChangeLog. Look right to you? Yes, although I object to the function named unshow_that_mofo. I'm assuming that we switch off assertions in production, the comments seem to indicate so. >Is it >safe for 21.4.5? Yes. I've reviewed the patch and it may not fix all the occurrences but we should get it in the hands of users and see whether there are anymore. Especially since we have users with easily reproducible test cases. andy