From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82623 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bromley@lavabit.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Encryption: verify a signature, encrypt attachments Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:01:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <42528.62.212.82.118.1355864480.squirrel@lavabit.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355864486 18609 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2012 21:01:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:26 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M30889@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 18 22:01:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl4IH-0005Cx-DZ for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:01:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl4I2-0007oO-08; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:01:26 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl4I0-0007o2-Hs for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:01:24 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl4Hz-0000zG-Dx for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:01:24 -0600 Original-Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl4Hx-0001O6-Qj for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:01:22 +0100 Original-Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE80011BCEB for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:01:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lavabit.com (hosted-by.scopehosts.com [62.212.82.118]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id COMXZ1FQXM9C for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:01:20 -0600 Original-Received: from 62.212.82.118 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bromley) by lavabit.com with HTTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:01:20 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=QHGup439e6LIeBdNUi+mUsx3ESfN/WQ3svJoXUF3D7KZa1AyLQw4iUficcj90EPHLjSj8EDmca8561cKMo23ZEGWxVHf20wV7/9nHOCdU6vdo64nh4DGNwVmjRFNyYJH1mqqPuQywMZO+uEhzavadItSF9CZDq6uZ1+fQfBOmms=; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.3194 Ham tokens: 0.000-9--49h-0s--0d--gnus, 0.001-4--21h-0s--0d--Gnus, 0.005-1--3h-0s--0d--H*F:D*lavabit.com, 0.005-1--3h-0s--0d--H*M:lavabit, 0.008-1--2h-0s--0d--H*RU:sk:karen.l Spam tokens: 0.993-1--0h-2s--3d--H*MI:212, 0.989-1466--100h-8421s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.988-1594--117h-9205s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.988-1594--117h-9205s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.987-1502--113h-8685s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: ham -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [72.249.41.33 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3194] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82623 Archived-At: I have two questions connected with encryption: 1. How to verify a signature without Gnus? Some of my friends use web interfaces to read email. Can they verify my PGPMIME signature? I assume that they should download raw message, save a part of it to a file, then verify signature using that file. Is it right? Which part of a raw message should be saved? 2. Can I encrypt an attachment with Gnus? I've noticed that Gnus only encrypts the body. Can it encrypt attachments? (I'm using PGPMIME).