From: "Simon Josefsson" <jas@extundo.com>
Cc: "Jari Aalto" <jari.aalto@cante.net>, "Emacs Gnus-L" <ding@gnus.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cvs 2005-10-29 score-mode.el::defvar
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:54:06 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45943.80.217.219.208.1130921646.squirrel@yxa.extundo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ek5zkbtj.fsf@uwo.ca>
>> If you refer to hook, then a lambda would do. But that would be ugly -
>> and remove-hook couldn't be used. A function is much cleaner.
>
> I don't see how a lambda would be needed. Here's an example from
> the sorting section of the info documentation.
>
> (setq gnus-thread-sort-functions
> '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number
> gnus-thread-sort-by-subject
> (not gnus-thread-sort-by-total-score)))
>
> The same construct works for gnus-article-sort-functions too.
I'm inclined to agree, I think we should revert that part of the patch.
Let's wait if we both misunderstood what the function would be used for.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-02 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-29 7:31 [PATCH] cvs 2005-10-29 score-mode.el::defvar gnus-score-edit-done-hook Jari Aalto
2005-10-29 9:13 ` Simon Josefsson
2005-10-30 22:27 ` [PATCH] cvs 2005-10-29 score-mode.el::defvar Dan Christensen
2005-10-31 9:59 ` Jari Aalto
2005-11-02 2:44 ` Dan Christensen
2005-11-02 8:54 ` Simon Josefsson [this message]
2005-11-08 15:14 ` gnus-article-sort-*-reverse (was: [PATCH] cvs 2005-10-29 score-mode.el::defvar) Reiner Steib
2005-11-08 15:45 ` gnus-article-sort-*-reverse Romain Francoise
2005-11-08 17:03 ` gnus-article-sort-*-reverse Reiner Steib
2005-11-08 18:56 ` gnus-article-sort-*-reverse Romain Francoise
2005-11-08 19:43 ` Group parameters and `(not gnus-article-sort-by-date)' (was: gnus-article-sort-*-reverse) Reiner Steib
2005-11-09 6:26 ` Group parameters and `(not gnus-article-sort-by-date)' Romain Francoise
2005-11-09 16:34 ` Simon Josefsson
2005-11-09 17:17 ` Reiner Steib
2005-11-09 18:05 ` Henrik Enberg
2005-11-09 20:37 ` Reiner Steib
2005-11-09 23:25 ` Simon Josefsson
2005-11-10 8:47 ` Reiner Steib
2005-11-10 18:10 ` Reiner Steib
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45943.80.217.219.208.1130921646.squirrel@yxa.extundo.com \
--to=jas@extundo.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=jari.aalto@cante.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).