From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75951 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: send from queue Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:59:32 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: <4lfwsgvmgb.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> References: <874o8x9dcc.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87ei80es4n.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295982002 16726 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2011 19:00:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:00:02 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24303@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jan 25 19:59:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pho7S-0000BS-A3 for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:59:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pho7O-00067a-Em; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:59:54 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pho7N-00067T-At for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:59:53 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pho7C-00081C-Sh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:59:53 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pho7C-0008ID-0q for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:59:42 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so641636bwz.17 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization :message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vMt6ZVZ/4/ZbQg/ufBeXq9jtEuOUZSPk8inLUFqa2Z8=; b=l8Tt9L9BDP+sDjNWdKD4Nt/Qwvu5qXL37hmaWSoMMk75ifxC3yuedQubtgKFZT8kEG PoJKuqtzNoZ7nqvOr0b5vwxk5foz0rSHVjmJoJzjCv86os6znbrf7GT9dhyhdfeEAjHx vVh7gYIcyKs4vsC9I+l83YtBHOim2936XvL78= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gr8/as16aMTa5mVrV/RADY9KpS6cSCsBD769d5GMUMur6w38PsarQ8zNokAJNEFCjn YIUeJ4aLQlS0rF+HBlR7kzXe3c0wNJYcXyTnLOehyByX4kguYm891rMyTOisu2FBi9ME Wm8S458jiBKYOBTfXRi5lAFW8VglUaf+5xfnc= Original-Received: by 10.204.46.210 with SMTP id k18mr5408895bkf.159.1295981981402; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:59:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j11sm7029153bka.12.2011.01.25.10.59.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:59:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ei80es4n.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> ("Adam \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Sj\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=C3\=B8gren\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:48:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75951 Archived-At: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=C3=B8gren) writes: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:38:55 +0100, Richard wrote: > >>>>> I got confused by your long explanations I think. Couldn't your entire >>>>> article be summed up as "I'd like the D s functionality found in draf= ts >>>>> to work in queue as well"? > >>>> Because its not the same thing. > >>> I am asking you "Couldn't your entire query be summed up as X" and you >>> answer "Because its not the same thing". Your answer doesn't parse for >>> me. > >> It couldnt be summed up as X because it wasnt just X. There was the open >> confusion about the differences between drafts and queues too. Like a >> lot of gnus the power comes, sometimes, at a cost - its not always as >> simple as "X" because of overlap- > > I'm sorry, I don't follow you at all. > > Please read the two first quotes above, and tell me: > > Do you really mean to say that you think your answer to my question > above made sense? Yes. Perfect sense. > > I think I was asking a yes/no question. I'm unsure of how "it couldnt be summed up as X" is unclear. my initial query was pretty clear. I have replaced it, again, down below in a block quote. > >>> What you want isn't to have D s do "Send message" in the queue group? > >> D s doesnt do that as I explained. When I hit "D" it makes the queued >> message as backwards read. > > Yes. I understand that is what happens right now. What I am trying to > ask you is: Isn't what you WANT in queue the same functionality AS what > D s does in drafts? I dont know how many more times I can say that I dont know. Draft send might be a totally different thing.=20 Why even bring drafts into it? I was looking for a way to send a single message from the queue. Nothing to do with drafts from a user perspective. > > I am not talking about how it CURRENTLY is in queue, I am talking about > how you WOULD LIKE it to work in queue. You snipped again. I dont think this is getting anywhere and email has a tendency to mask any humour/subtleties in tone. I cant make it clearer than this:- ,---- | I cant find how to send a single message from the queue without | editing. I'm guessing its there or should be there. I would like all | outgoing mail to go without a prompt to the message queue, review the | queue later and send one by one. Sure I can send them all at once using | JS too from the group buffer. `---- Since then D s has been mentioned. I hadnt found that myself. And it doesnt work for me as I have mentioned a few times already. regards r.