From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58870 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Repeated spam registration Date: 14 Oct 2004 14:47:21 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n1xg1gmrq.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097779666 4559 80.91.229.6 (14 Oct 2004 18:47:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7408@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Oct 14 20:47:38 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CIAdW-0003SI-00 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:47:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CIAdO-0005cO-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:30 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CIAdJ-0005cJ-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:25 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CIAdH-0001E0-Te for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.bwh.harvard.edu (sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.44]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625E03A0038 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:23 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 21766 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2004 18:37:38 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: dhanak@isis.vanderbilt.edu, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.9?user:?tzz@[134.174.9.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Oct 2004 18:37:38 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "David Hanak" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "David Hanak" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:10:041014:dhanak@isis.vanderbilt.edu::ff8bd0781d0e59a8:26d X-Hashcash: 1:10:041014:ding@gnus.org::1bb2c9d3a523a4d3:38f In-Reply-To: (David Hanak's message of "Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:34:11 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58870 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58870 On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, dhanak@isis.vanderbilt.edu wrote: > I use spam.el with bogofilter to filter spam with great satisfaction. > There is one minor detail, though which is bothering me. Every once in > a while I have to go back to old, read mail and read it again. These > messages are ususally already marked as ham. After I reread them and > exit the group, they are obviously marked as read, which is a ham mark, > so they are *reregistered* with bogofilter. Because I use the registry > to remember spam classification, they are duly unregistered before the > reregistration. So this is what I get in the *Messages* buffer: > > ,----[ *Messages* ] >| Unregistering 1 specific articles as ham using backend spam-use-bogofilter >| Registering 1 articles as ham using backend spam-use-bogofilter >| 1 ham messages were processed by backend spam-use-bogofilter. > `---- > > This is of course slow and completely unnecessary. I tried adding the > ancient-mark to the list of ham-marks, but that only resulted in the > omission of the unregistration, the reregistration was still done, which > is obviously worse. Is this how it is supposed to work? Is there a way > to solve this problem? I noticed this problem too, I'll see what's going on. In the meantime, rest easy knowing that your CPU is not underutilized :) Ted