* Repeated spam registration
@ 2004-10-13 18:34 David Hanak
2004-10-14 17:45 ` Xavier Maillard
2004-10-14 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Hanak @ 2004-10-13 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
I use spam.el with bogofilter to filter spam with great satisfaction.
There is one minor detail, though which is bothering me. Every once in
a while I have to go back to old, read mail and read it again. These
messages are ususally already marked as ham. After I reread them and
exit the group, they are obviously marked as read, which is a ham mark,
so they are *reregistered* with bogofilter. Because I use the registry
to remember spam classification, they are duly unregistered before the
reregistration. So this is what I get in the *Messages* buffer:
,----[ *Messages* ]
| Unregistering 1 specific articles as ham using backend spam-use-bogofilter
| Registering 1 articles as ham using backend spam-use-bogofilter
| 1 ham messages were processed by backend spam-use-bogofilter.
`----
This is of course slow and completely unnecessary. I tried adding the
ancient-mark to the list of ham-marks, but that only resulted in the
omission of the unregistration, the reregistration was still done, which
is obviously worse. Is this how it is supposed to work? Is there a way
to solve this problem?
Thanks,
--
David Hanak - Research Engineer
Institute for Software Integrated Systems | http://www.isis.vanderbilt.edu
Vanderbilt University | Work phone: (615) 343 1319
Box 1829, Station B, Nashville, TN 37235 | PGP key ID: 266BC45F
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Repeated spam registration
2004-10-13 18:34 Repeated spam registration David Hanak
@ 2004-10-14 17:45 ` Xavier Maillard
2004-10-14 18:45 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-10-14 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xavier Maillard @ 2004-10-14 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 13 oct 2004, David Hanak wrote:
> Hi,
Yo,
> This is of course slow and completely unnecessary. I tried
> adding the ancient-mark to the list of ham-marks, but that only
> resulted in the omission of the unregistration, the
> reregistration was still done, which is obviously worse. Is
> this how it is supposed to work? Is there a way to solve this
> problem?
Do you use the Gnus registry ? If not, give it a try then.
Regards.
--
,--. Xavier Maillard, Reims, France ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- ) http://www.emacsfr.org/ ((_/)o o(\_))
\ `-' `-'(. .)`-'
`-. Debian, a variant of the GNU operating system. \_/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Repeated spam registration
2004-10-13 18:34 Repeated spam registration David Hanak
2004-10-14 17:45 ` Xavier Maillard
@ 2004-10-14 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2004-10-14 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, dhanak@isis.vanderbilt.edu wrote:
> I use spam.el with bogofilter to filter spam with great satisfaction.
> There is one minor detail, though which is bothering me. Every once in
> a while I have to go back to old, read mail and read it again. These
> messages are ususally already marked as ham. After I reread them and
> exit the group, they are obviously marked as read, which is a ham mark,
> so they are *reregistered* with bogofilter. Because I use the registry
> to remember spam classification, they are duly unregistered before the
> reregistration. So this is what I get in the *Messages* buffer:
>
> ,----[ *Messages* ]
>| Unregistering 1 specific articles as ham using backend spam-use-bogofilter
>| Registering 1 articles as ham using backend spam-use-bogofilter
>| 1 ham messages were processed by backend spam-use-bogofilter.
> `----
>
> This is of course slow and completely unnecessary. I tried adding the
> ancient-mark to the list of ham-marks, but that only resulted in the
> omission of the unregistration, the reregistration was still done, which
> is obviously worse. Is this how it is supposed to work? Is there a way
> to solve this problem?
I noticed this problem too, I'll see what's going on. In the
meantime, rest easy knowing that your CPU is not underutilized :)
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-14 18:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-13 18:34 Repeated spam registration David Hanak
2004-10-14 17:45 ` Xavier Maillard
2004-10-14 18:45 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-10-14 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).