Re: CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el

["Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Thu, 20 May 2004, asjo@koldfront.dk wrote:

> The first patch changes the behaviour as the comment change says -
> instead of only moving ham articles out of spam-groups, it moves ham
> articles out of non-ham-groups.
> 
> This makes sense in my setup, because I do not want to declare my
> nnml:spam-group as spam (I do not want spam marked as expired
> automatically), so I leave it as unclassified (so it's non-ham, but
> not spam).

I think, as I mentioned, that spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups
is the solution to your request.

> spam.el doesn't work for me without the second, following, patch,
> which I basically thought was a typo-correction; alas I'm only
> starting to learn elisp, so I may very well be wrong.

You're right, and I didn't catch it earlier.  Looks like Emacs
Lisp allows you to declare a variable twice in the same let
binding.  Weird.  Fixed in CVS, thanks!

Ted