From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54613 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: can gnus-unread-mark be a ham mark? Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:52:32 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n1xst8fbz.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <764qxr3356.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4n4qxqwxjm.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nr80t8id3.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <76n0bhxqbs.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067622819 387 80.91.224.253 (31 Oct 2003 17:53:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3154@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Oct 31 18:53:36 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AFdSq-0005BP-00 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:53:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AFdSj-0008E4-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:29 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AFdSd-0008D8-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:23 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14FA3A004C for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h9VHqt716075; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:52:55 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h9VHqWk13038; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:52:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Jake Colman X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Jake Colman , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <76n0bhxqbs.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> (Jake Colman's message of "Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:35:51 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54613 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54613 On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, colman@ppllc.com wrote: >>>>>> "BW" == Bill White writes: > > BW> On Fri Oct 31 2003 at 10:47, Ted Zlatanov > BW> said: > >> That way, I go into my spam group, mark ham with `!', and just > >> exit the group. > > BW> [...] > > >> The ham-marked articles, namely the ticked ones, get moved to > >> "mail" and *unmarked* (this is the part I think you want), so > >> they look fresh and new. I don't use a ham-exit-processor on > >> them currently. > > BW> Excellent - this is working for me now, and ticked makes even > BW> more sense to me than unmarked. Thanks! > > You could also have used the gnus-del-mark ('r') for the same thing, > right? Any ham-mark, really, will work. Ted