From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49821 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Some spam messages are not sorted into the corresponding group Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:26:15 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n1y2ng2ko.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <873cn85p1u.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <87adhf2ib2.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nhebjlux3.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87smv3daw5.fsf@splinter.inka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044393968 4843 80.91.224.249 (4 Feb 2003 21:26:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18gAZv-0001Fb-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:26:03 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18gAag-0007dg-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:26:50 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:27:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA15114 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:27:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 8818 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 21:26:29 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 8813 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 21:26:29 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 21:26:29 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h14LQPj10934 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:26:25 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h14LQFu23531; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:26:15 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87smv3daw5.fsf@splinter.inka.de> (Christopher Splinter's message of "Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:54:50 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49821 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49821 On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote: > (spam-split) used in *Article* (on the full message, of course), > returns "junk", which is the value of spam-split-group. In spite > of that, the mail's not split properly. > >> Could something else in your split methods be matching? > > I wouldn't think so, there's only one entry which moves > messages to mail.misc: > > (setq nnmail-split-fancy > '(| (: spam-split) > [...] > "mail.misc")) > > If that's not enough, I can post the rest of the list too; it > wouldn't be very enlightening, though. I'm pretty stumped. spam-split is behaving exactly as it should by itself; spam-check-bogofilter is behaving exactly as it should by itself. Inside nnmail-split-fancy, however, they fail. How about (defun spam-split-test () (debug (spam-split)) nil) Add (: spam-split-test) in your nnmail-split-fancy before spam-split and see what the debug error is. Hit `c' to continue once you hit the debugger. Let me know what the stack trace says - it will tell us what really is happening in there. Thanks Ted