From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61965 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el: Bugs, compatibility with v5-10 Date: 13 Feb 2006 14:04:13 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4n4q33axn6.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87k6ccjgzr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4nbqxkmh39.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ek2g8cld.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4nirrsgrfc.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <4noe1h8uvw.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139857512 5083 80.91.229.2 (13 Feb 2006 19:05:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10492@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Feb 13 20:05:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8j0F-0006Bq-6V for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:04:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F8j09-0000HW-00; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:04:45 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F8izk-0000HR-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:04:20 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F8izi-0000Y3-6m for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:04:20 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F8izf-0007x2-00 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:04:15 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 25764 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 18:57:32 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) ([134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 18:57:32 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:060213:ding@gnus.org::crzOGUYs7oRUxayw:00007JBO In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:00:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61965 Archived-At: On 9 Feb 2006, reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc wrote: On Wed, Feb 08 2006, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > >> The differences are pretty major, and I would actually like to bring >> the CVS version of spam.el and spam-report.el over to Emacs CVS. > > You might have to restore compatibility with Emacs 20.7 if the version > in v5-10 has it. (The versions in Emacs and v5-10 should be equal.) I haven't broken compatibility, to my knowledge, but perhaps it's not 20.7-compatible. Is that really mandatory? It seems that, with 21 out and 22 coming, it should be less significant. If I have to, I'll dig out an old version and get testing, I suppose. I'll follow up separately on the problems you reported. When you decide it's time, we'll move spam.el, no problem. Ted