From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61881 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mozilla Date: 7 Feb 2006 10:41:25 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4n4q3bfa6y.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <877j88zq93.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87psm0ttfl.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <4nlkwomhm8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mzh3nyno.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139327154 5474 80.91.229.2 (7 Feb 2006 15:45:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10410@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 07 16:45:53 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6V1x-0003Y3-Gs for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:45:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F6V1s-0004pC-00; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:45:20 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F6UyL-0004p6-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:41:41 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F6UyH-0002RW-OV for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:41:41 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F6UyB-0002n6-00 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:41:31 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 3540 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2006 15:34:54 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: oub@mat.ucm.es, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) ([134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Feb 2006 15:34:54 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Uwe Brauer" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Uwe Brauer" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:060207:ding@gnus.org::rHKQUz1rfVUwq3vA:00000tVp X-Hashcash: 1:20:060207:oub@mat.ucm.es::/ObouhcswNluX8bw:0006rIZ In-Reply-To: <87mzh3nyno.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:25:47 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61881 Archived-At: On 7 Feb 2006, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote: >>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: > > Ted> On 6 Feb 2006, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote: >>>>>>>> "Reiner" == Reiner Steib writes: > > Ted> That's part of the IMAP protocol I believe. It would be nice, > I see > > Ted> however, if nnimap.el could transform those labels into header > Ted> entries like the ones Reiner showed. That's the > Ted> quick-and-dirty solution. > > Well I wrote a quick and very dirty solution by adding a label to > nnmail or nnfolder articles, using gnus-summary-edit-article. This > function even allows to edit imap articles (using the second argument) > > *If ARG is 2, edit the raw articles even in read-only groups.* > > However the saving is not a real saving so this does not help (whether > it is a clever idea to raw edit mime articles is another question). I think this is not as good as backend support. With IMAP, for example, you can set the labels (flags) for a whole range of messages at once quickly; with any editing solution it's a lot slower, plus it's only for Gnus. > Do you think it is easy to implement a solution for the nnimap > backend? I don't know how much is implemented in imap.el already. If there is no support for flags yet, it's a lot of work. > Meanwhile another solution occurred to me, after having read the > discussion in the links Rainer mentioned. I saw that some people have > a solution the other way around. Instead of putting labels in the > group, they put labels in there corresponding planner entries. I just > remembered I have a similar solution for the todo-mode.el pkg written > by Oliver Seidel. My function adds the subject, message-ID and group > name as an todo entry in the category email. May be I should enhance > that for other categories, like NeedReply, Important etc. I remember this. We could also use the gnus-registry to associate message-ID with any custom data, including labels. I just think that any Gnus-only solution is worse than a generic solution. > Btw Ted do you recall our discussion about a generalizing > gnus-summary-limit function to include BBDB or NO BBDB entries. Your > solution worked for all net address in a BBDB entry save the first > one, mine vice verse, however you claimed that your function could do > both, but you had to look into it. Did you do that? No, sorry. I must have dropped the ball on that one. Can you please send me the latest versions of your and my code? Thanks Ted