From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59381 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: @code{spam.el} vs. @file{spam.el} Date: 7 Dec 2004 14:08:02 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4n4qiy53l9.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1102448001 22715 80.91.229.6 (7 Dec 2004 19:33:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7920@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 07 20:33:16 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CbkpU-0007eA-00 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 20:16:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CbkhB-0004Km-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:08:21 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Cbkh6-0004Kh-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:08:16 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cbkh1-0004al-PD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:08:11 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E343A0226 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:08:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 20816 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2004 18:56:52 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Dec 2004 18:56:51 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:041207:ding@gnus.org::2ivjOzo/zRKMP6Z2:00006lPV In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:10:47 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59381 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59381 On Thu, 02 Dec 2004, reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc wrote: > [ From gmane.emacs.gnus.commits ... ] > > On Wed, Nov 17 2004, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > >> Modified: ChangeLog gnus.texi >> >> replaced @file{spam.el} with @code{spam.el} everywhere for consistency. > [...] >> -The idea behind @file{spam.el} is to have a control center for spam detection >> -and filtering in Gnus. To that end, @file{spam.el} does two things: it >> +The idea behind @code{spam.el} is to have a control center for spam detection >> +and filtering in Gnus. To that end, @code{spam.el} does two things: it >> filters new mail, and it analyzes mail known to be spam or ham. >> -@dfn{Ham} is the name used throughout @file{spam.el} to indicate >> +@dfn{Ham} is the name used throughout @code{spam.el} to indicate >> non-spam messages. > > I don't understand these changes. (info "(texinfo)file") says to use > @file for filenames. @code is more general. It is correct that the > current usage is not consistent. We have (after your change): > > 67 matches for "@file{[^}]*\.el}" in buffer: gnus.texi > 43 matches for "@code{[^}]*\.el}" in buffer: gnus.texi > > IMO, we should rather fix those 43 occurances of @code{*.el} instead > of removing the correctly formated @file{*.el} entries. There are two issues: 1) I refer to spam.el as a library AND as a file, so some of the @code{} markup is correct, I think. 2) I thought there was a problem with the @file{} markup with some Texinfo versions, but I may be mis-remembering. Anyhow, I'll gladly make the change as requested, where the *file* spam.el is mentioned. I did not change the places where I refer to spam.el as a library or as an agent acting on behalf of the user. Let me know if that should be changed. Ted