Re: What's wrong with my spam.el settings now?

["Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, jas@extundo.com wrote:

> This information and the information earlier in the thread doesn't add
> up for me.  Earlier I interpreted the problem that seen marks were
> visible on articles the second time you entered a group with that
> article.  Did I misunderstand that?  Is that still the problem?  If
> the seen list is updated as above, then the summary buffer shouldn't
> have a "unseen" mark on the 11844 article upon entering the group the
> second time.  Did it?
> 
> I'm not sure how this problem relate to the spam mark, but presumably
> it is because spam.el use the seen mark to decide which articles to
> mark as spam?

In spam groups, spam.el will spam-mark unseen articles only (unless
spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam is nil, which does not apply here
because Bjorn reports the unseen mark is returning).  So the problem
seems to be the unseen mark's return, not the spam.el code.

Ted