From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61092 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What's wrong with my spam.el settings now? Date: 4 Oct 2005 14:04:40 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4n64sdjgzr.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87mznufe09.fsf@lucien.dreaming> <4nmzm7k9jb.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d5n3y89s.fsf@lucien.dreaming> <4nek7iiiho.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ek7iwjqe.fsf@lucien.dreaming> <4noe6mgu71.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4n64smz4gg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87slvn4sl4.fsf@lucien.dreaming> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128449523 17946 80.91.229.2 (4 Oct 2005 18:12:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 18:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9624@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Oct 04 20:12:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EMrF7-0002x6-2O for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:10:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EMrEw-0004jb-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EMr9t-0004jW-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:04:57 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EMr9q-0004Xf-Be for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:04:56 -0500 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EMr9g-0003my-00 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:04:45 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6126 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2005 17:59:47 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: jas@extundo.com, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Oct 2005 17:59:47 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Simon Josefsson" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Simon Josefsson" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:051004:jas@extundo.com::NFXx6G3B1RaTn27o:000lBr X-Hashcash: 1:20:051004:ding@gnus.org::xXqXEZEGg60ZRbbq:0000Auf8 In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:18:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61092 Archived-At: On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, jas@extundo.com wrote: > This information and the information earlier in the thread doesn't add > up for me. Earlier I interpreted the problem that seen marks were > visible on articles the second time you entered a group with that > article. Did I misunderstand that? Is that still the problem? If > the seen list is updated as above, then the summary buffer shouldn't > have a "unseen" mark on the 11844 article upon entering the group the > second time. Did it? > > I'm not sure how this problem relate to the spam mark, but presumably > it is because spam.el use the seen mark to decide which articles to > mark as spam? In spam groups, spam.el will spam-mark unseen articles only (unless spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam is nil, which does not apply here because Bjorn reports the unseen mark is returning). So the problem seems to be the unseen mark's return, not the spam.el code. Ted