From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51020 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el and bogofilter. Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:24:15 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n65q84lgg.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nhe9spzu8.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1048534178 18800 80.91.224.249 (24 Mar 2003 19:29:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Mon Mar 24 20:29:36 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18xXb5-0004fE-00 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:27:03 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18xXYi-00010I-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:24:36 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:25:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA24709 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:25:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 45368 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 19:24:18 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 45363 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 19:24:18 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 19:24:18 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2OJOFj19239; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:24:15 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h2OJOFZ12602; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:24:15 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Jody Klymak X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Jody Klymak , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Jody Klymak's message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:09:39 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.2 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51020 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51020 On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu wrote: > I have been able to train bogofilter from within gnus. I set a > group to be a ham group, and tell it to process ham and spam (S x) > with bogofilter on exit, and it apparently does so because I am able > to change the bogosity of articles (checked via M s t). Great. Puzzling but great that you have it working. Normally you need to set the spam/ham exit processor in order to train bogofilter or other tools. > However, I am a little confused as to what spam-split actually does. > Does it simply try and mark the article as spam or does it try and > put it somewhere? If it tries to put it somewhere, where would that > be? spam-split only moves the article to spam-split-group if it's spam, marks are not set by it. > I'm using nnimap, and have the following in my .gnus: > > (require 'spam);; but really I dont' require spam! > (setq > nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy > nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX" > nnimap-split-fancy '(| > (: spam-split) > ;; default mailbox > "mail/Inbox.spam")) > > All my INBOX gets put in mail/Inbox.spam. > > I have spam-split-group set to "spam" Should it be set to something > else if I am using imap? No, nnimap-split-fancy knows to interpret it in the IMAP context, and nnmail-split-fancy will do the corresponding translation to nnml and such. You have to set spam-use-xyz if you want to use tool XYZ in spam-split. For instance, spam-use-bogofilter will detect spam in spam-split with Bogofilter. Have you looked at the intro to spam.el in the manual? If it was confusing or unclear, let me know what parts, and how I should rephrase it if you have input. > I have to admit an embarrassing lack of spam since last night when I > got this working, but I do want to find out where my spam group will > be. Yeah, I keep a good 50 messages around for testing - the spam that would not die, heh. Thanks Ted