From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59315 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug: spam articles not processed Date: 1 Dec 2004 10:36:59 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4n7jo2m3ms.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <4n7jokbj24.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nu0rclmrx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4ny8gkxysm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nllcjnwpb.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101916888 9848 80.91.229.6 (1 Dec 2004 16:01:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7855@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 01 17:01:23 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CZWaV-0004bf-00 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:40:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CZWXk-0005At-00; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:37:24 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CZWXc-0005An-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:37:16 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CZWXU-0000I8-4z for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:37:08 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11333A026A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:37:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 642 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2004 15:25:57 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Dec 2004 15:25:56 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:041201:ding@gnus.org::8x6pRLStdIs0i6E0:0000Az+n In-Reply-To: <4nllcjnwpb.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "30 Nov 2004 11:11:28 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59315 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59315 On 30 Nov 2004, tzz@lifelogs.com wrote: > gnus-summary-pop-limit throws an error if there are no limits on the > stack. > > I could have gone directly to the > > (gnus-summary-limit nil 'pop) > > call that gnus-summary-pop-limit does, but it seemed like a better > idea to go through the higher-level API. As I already mentioned, I > don't know the summary limit functionality so if anyone else thinks > there's a better way, they are welcome to correct me. Well, popping the summary limit makes spam.el lose track of ham messages for me (I have the tick-mark as a ham mark). Until I figure out what's happening, I'm disabling the summary limit pop. Any suggestions are most welcome. Ted