From: "Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: wallowing out of the spam quagmire
Date: 22 Jun 2004 12:45:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4n7jtzy215.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m38yeg9xpo.fsf@newsguy.com> (Harry Putnam's message of "Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:40:35 -0500")
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, reader@newsguy.com wrote:
> My usage will probably be the simplest one would find. I want to run
> bogofilter against only one group. (My setup described in previous
> post) .. that group gets whatever has made it by SA and dozens of my
> own procmail rules including splitting out many list-server messages
> from dozens of subscribed lists. So this group doesn't get lots of
> mail. However, the spam that shows up there though is fairly
> sophisticated and will be hard to indentify as spam. (for computer
> tools).
>
> It is readily indentifieable by humans though, so I thought if I showed
> enough of it to bogofilter, that filter would eventually become able to
> indentify most of it. Maybe that isn't how Bogofilter works..?
>
> At this stage I'd like to see a few steps that would get this process
> started. Something like (examples are made up):
>
> 1) put (some elisp) in G p of this group (auto-detect I guess)
Yes, auto-detect with spam-use-bogofilter.
> 2) install bogofilter and set (`bogo-on' to t)
You should (setq spam-use-bogofilter t), that's the most important
thing BEFORE you call (spam-initialize).
> 3) set variables (spam-group "groupname") (ham-group "groupname")
Set the group spam/ham classification you mean. You can do that on a
topic too, it's easier for many groups.
> 4) enter group and mark messages spam or ham
> 5) let bogofiter wallow around in spam-group ham-group several times
> a day.
> Do steps four/five 7,535 times and then bogofilter will know what is
> what....
Yes, this is very sensible.
Your workflow then is:
1. Enter ham group A with parameters:
auto-detect with spam-use-bogofilter
spam-process-destination "S"
spam-process (spam spam-use-bogofilter)
1.1. mark spam in ham group A (if any was missed by auto-detect)
1.2. quit ham group A
1.3. the marked spam goes to the spam-process-destination, after
being processed with the bogofilter processor
2. Enter spam group S with parameters:
spam-process-destination nil (just delete spam)
ham-process-destination "A"
spam-process (ham spam-use-bogofilter)
2.1. mark ham (with a ham-mark, e.g. !)
2.2. quit spam group S
2.3. the marked ham goes to the ham-process-destination, after being
processed with bogofilter
Specifically regarding the treatment and motion of the spam/ham
articles when exiting, you may want to look at the new spam.el and
specifically the spam-summary-exit-behavior variable.
I also like spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group set to t,
so instead of ! ham is marked unread when it goes to ham group A.
I hope that explains things...
Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-22 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-19 18:27 Harry Putnam
2004-06-20 6:58 ` Jonas Steverud
2004-06-22 1:21 ` Harry Putnam
2004-06-22 1:53 ` Jody Klymak
2004-06-22 10:56 ` Harry Putnam
2004-06-22 15:03 ` Jody Klymak
2004-06-22 15:20 ` Jody Klymak
2004-06-22 7:52 ` Jonas Steverud
2004-06-22 15:18 ` Jody Klymak
2004-06-22 16:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-22 16:32 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-25 13:37 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-06-25 14:26 ` Daniel Pittman
2004-06-25 18:46 ` Chris Green
2004-06-26 10:34 ` Harry Putnam
2004-06-26 14:55 ` [OT] Dual-MTA setup and spam filtering (was Re: wallowing out of the spam quagmire) Daniel Pittman
2004-06-26 10:18 ` wallowing out of the spam quagmire Harry Putnam
2004-06-20 23:44 ` Kevin Ryde
2004-06-21 4:28 ` Daniel Pittman
2004-06-21 14:35 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-22 1:40 ` Harry Putnam
2004-06-22 16:45 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4n7jtzy215.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).