From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57123 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus SPAM support, and email based reporting. Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:17:45 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n7jw6r7me.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87isfy7p6a.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <1xmm1vhg.fsf@random.localnet.unwireduniverse.com> <4nzn95gwu7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fzawgyxq.fsf@dod.no> <4npt9zj1x6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zn93xnoq.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082737985 25968 80.91.224.253 (23 Apr 2004 16:33:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5663@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Apr 23 18:32:48 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BH3bb-00041L-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:32:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BH3bT-0004Vm-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:32:39 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BH3bO-0004Vh-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BH3bL-0005Hl-AR for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:32:31 -0500 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B183A0047 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:32:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from asimov (asimov [134.174.9.63]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i3NGWT117558 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:32:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87zn93xnoq.fsf@dod.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:34:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57123 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57123 On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, sb@dod.no wrote: >>>>>> Ted Zlatanov : > >> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, sb@dod.no wrote: > >>> Note that there are two different ways of reporting the spam: >>> - as resends >>> - MIME attachments > >> We'll just add a digest and attachment version of the reporter: > >> (defun spam-report-resend-attachment (&rest articles) >> ...) >> (defun spam-report-resend-digest (&rest articles) >> ...) > > That would make it three different ways. By "resend" I meant what > happens when you do `S D r'. It's what I need for one of my > addresses. The idea is that the spam exit processor will do it automatically when you exit the group, so you don't need S D r or anything like that - just to mark spam articles. > The difference between resend attachment and resend digest is that > with the latter, the message/rfc822 parts are wrapped inside a > multipart/digest, and the first part should be skipped when > unpacking. I don't know how significant this difference would be > for the unpacking filter...? Let's list the possibilities and we'll see if they should all be separate spam exit processors or we can generalize to 2 or 3 processors and do the rest with group/topic parameters. Ted