From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55089 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Possible SpamAssassin node info documentation error. Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:32:03 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n7k1ck0ho.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <87ptgy5mc0.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <878yltsdw5.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070555629 8746 80.91.224.253 (4 Dec 2003 16:33:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3629@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Dec 04 17:33:46 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ARwQE-0003s1-00 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:33:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ARwQ4-0000Ml-00; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:33:36 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ARwQ0-0000Mg-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:33:32 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F093A0027 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:33:31 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hB4GWc714961; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:32:38 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hB4GW3X06790; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:32:03 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Kevin Ryde X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Ryde , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <878yltsdw5.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:03:06 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55089 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55089 On Thu, 04 Dec 2003, user42@zip.com.au wrote: > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> >> (defun kevin-spamassassin () >> (save-excursion >> (widen) > > Should there be a save-restriction too, or does gnus not care about > that once it gets to the splitting stage? I added save-restriction in this example and the other one (in Fancy Mail Splitting). Thanks! Ted