Re: spam.el moves /all/ read articles to my spam group!

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, asf@void.at wrote:
> Ugh. Seems like I have managed to fsck up my spam.el setup again.
> 
> Repeatable behaviour:
> 
> * Enter group Read one article. Article has "R" mark. No spam marked
> * articles in group.  Exit group Messages buffer says: ,----
>   | Exiting summary buffer and applying spam rules
>   | Registering spam with bogofilter
>   | Moving to nnml+private:spambox: (3325)...
>   | Wrote /home/asf/Mail/spambox/18739
>   `----
> * Enter spam group. Previously read article is there. Yikes!
> 
> Badness. What would be the cause of that?

I added code to move spam-marked articles, but "R" articles should not
be affected.

Can you replace spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine with this:

(defun spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine (&optional group)
  (let ((articles gnus-newsgroup-articles)
	article tomove)
    (dolist (article articles)
      (gnus-summary-remove-process-mark article)
      (when (eq (gnus-summary-article-mark article) gnus-spam-mark)
        (debug article (gnus-summary-article-mark article))   
	(gnus-summary-mark-article article gnus-expirable-mark)
	(push article tomove)))

    ;; now do the actual move
    (when (stringp group)
      (dolist (article tomove)
	(gnus-summary-set-process-mark article))
      (when tomove 
       (debug group)
       (gnus-summary-move-article nil group)))))

Just hit "c" when you get the debugger pop-up windows, and try to keep
track of those article numbers vs. the ones that were marked "R" in
the summary.  I need to find out if a) articles marked as read are
seen as spam somehow, and b) the articles are being moved by
spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine.

I haven't observed this behavior here.

Thanks
Ted