Re: bug in spam.el and expiry issue

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, bruce+usenet@cenderis.demon.co.uk wrote:
> First the typo:

Thanks, fixed.

> Secondly, how do I sanely use spam.el with auto-expire (or
> total-expire)?  It seems that spam gets categorised OK, but the ham
> never gets processed, since (presumably) by the time the check
> happens, it's marked with E, which is correctly not processed.

Ham will only get processed in ham groups, are you sure you are in a
ham group and have a ham processor defined?  The processing should
happen before the expired-mark is applied, but I have not tested that
particular setup, so if you could check and let me know, I'd
appreciate it.  I may have to modify the behavior of total and auto
expiry a little when spam.el hooks into the summary exit, if the
expiry happens before spam-summary-prepare-exit is invoked.

Ted