From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55044 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-registry, speed up splitting ? Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 20:47:44 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n8ylwuh1b.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nllpwfdyu.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070329757 7459 80.91.224.253 (2 Dec 2003 01:49:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 01:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3584@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 02 02:49:13 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQzf7-0005eB-00 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:49:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AQzf1-0000Cz-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:49:08 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AQzey-0000Cu-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:49:04 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63313A005E for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:49:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hB21mI725615; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:48:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hB21liu17680; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:47:44 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Xavier Maillard X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Xavier Maillard , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Xavier Maillard's message of "Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:51:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55044 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55044 On Mon, 01 Dec 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: > Ted Zlatanov disait r=E9cemment que : >=20 >> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: >> >>> Since I use gnus-registry stuff, it seems to me that my gnus is >>> much more responsive especially when splitting. >>>=20 >>> Does anybody have the same impression or is it the 'fault' of my >>> new laptop ? >> >> Do you mean "less responsive"? I'll assume so. >=20 > No I had the impression (but I may be wrong), that it was quicker ;) OK, your subject header was misleading, it seemed you want me to "speed up splitting." I undertsand now. Maybe the registry is finding matches sooner, so the rest of the spam checks don't need to be made? As you can see, I can provide plausible reasons for why the registry would make things slower or faster :) It's not a O(1) operation, that's the bottom line. The speed depends on too many things. Ted