From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51302 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Can spam-split be used with "normal" mail splitting? Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:17:51 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n8yuimleo.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1049987916 25823 80.91.224.249 (10 Apr 2003 15:18:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Thu Apr 10 17:18:34 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 193dov-0006i4-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:18:34 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 193doX-0007Pw-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:19:15 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [64.157.176.121]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA11048 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:19:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 97736 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2003 15:17:54 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 97731 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 15:17:53 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 15:17:53 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h3AFHpI04777 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:17:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h3AFHp900492; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:17:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Norbert Koch's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:01:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51302 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51302 On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, nk@viteno.net wrote: > I still don't use fancy-mail-splitting, but the standard way. It's > possible to use functions with that, too, so I've added a stanza > like > > (setq nnmail-split-methods > `(("tomb" spam-split) > ... other settings ...)) > > but I wonder whether this DTRT. Does anyone have information about > this? I don't use nnmail-split-methods, and I don't know of anyone that does with spam.el (except you :) As long as nnmail-split-methods processing understand that nil means "pass-through" and a string is a group name, there should be no issues at all. Thanks Ted