From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50340 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: planned spam.el features Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:42:50 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4n8yw5wupx.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nr8b2wdwt.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87lm19q7bb.fsf@pobox.com> <4nbs22a202.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <8765rc94vb.fsf@fire-swamp.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046101692 11546 80.91.224.249 (24 Feb 2003 15:48:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18nKlZ-0002cv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:43:42 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18nKlG-00036q-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:43:22 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:44:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA06075 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:44:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 1527 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 15:43:06 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1522 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 15:43:05 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 15:43:05 -0000 Original-Received: from chubby.bwh.harvard.edu (chubby [134.174.9.50]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h1OFgoj22766 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:42:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by chubby.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h1OFgok09500; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:42:50 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <8765rc94vb.fsf@fire-swamp.org> (Stephen Zander's message of "Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:00:40 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50340 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50340 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, gibreel@pobox.com wrote: > Since writing my original mail, I've upgraded to Oort 0.15, and I > have to say that spam.el officially rocks!!! That's good, I hope you keep enjoying it. I would welcome any suggestions for improvements of the documentation or functionality. > The only thing I need now is the ability to use '-S' & '-N' instead > of '-s' & '-n' so that any spam/ham messages are reclassified rather > than added to the pool. Any likelihood of you adding that, rather > than my doing so? Well, I can make it a customizable option, but with the next major iteration of spam.el there will be real reclassification. What this means is, after a message has been processed with a spam processor, you could "undo" that processing through reclassification. Is there a way to specify "-s if message is not registered, -S otherwise"? Or are the -S and -N flags OK always? I'm worried that -S on an unregistered message might cause a skew in the statistics, and I don't know if bogofilter allows for that. If that can't be done, I'll make the -s/-n flags customizable until the reclassification abilities are in place. Ted