From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/60988 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.discuss,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus/spam-report.el: User-Agent for Gmane spam reporting Date: 20 Sep 2005 12:39:07 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4naci7k82c.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127234608 23349 80.91.229.2 (20 Sep 2005 16:43:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "gmane dicuss" Original-X-From: gmane-discuss-admin@hawk.netfonds.no Tue Sep 20 18:43:22 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from hawk.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.246]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHlA7-0006gj-6S for gd-gmane-discuss@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:40:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hawk.netfonds.no) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EHlA3-0006I9-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:40:03 +0200 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EHl9D-0006Hx-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:39:11 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 19441 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2005 16:34:25 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Sep 2005 16:34:24 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Ding List" , "gmane dicuss " Original-To: "Ding List" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:050920:gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no::xJtktLmV03VeZ/2s:00000000000000000000000000000002Hkt X-Hashcash: 1:20:050920:ding@gnus.org::WTP0SnQRcqnT6Xe/:000044O2 In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:21:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 Original-Sender: gmane-discuss-admin@hawk.netfonds.no Errors-To: gmane-discuss-admin@hawk.netfonds.no X-BeenThere: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.discuss:8681 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60988 Archived-At: On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc wrote: > wouldn't it be nice to use `gnus-extended-version' instead of > `gnus-emacs-version' for the Gmane spam reporting? This would include > Gnus version which is more useful in this context, IMO. > > ELISP> (gnus-emacs-version) > "Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)" > ELISP> (gnus-extended-version) > "Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)" > > Unless Gmane prefers the current format for some reason, I'll commit > this change: Works for me. Thanks! Ted