Re: spam-report.el pinging too fast?

["Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Tue, 25 May 2004, larsi@gnus.org wrote:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> 
>> So there's two solutions to this: Either spam-report.el could wait
>> for a response (and serialize the reports), or I could write a new
>> "programmatic" spam.php that queues the reports and does the real
>> handling of them later.
> 
> I've now done the latter.  :-)
> 
> The new URL is
> 
> http://gmane.org/ping-spam.php?group=some.group&article=1234&command=spam
> 
> (or unspam).
> 
> spam.gmane.org checks User-Agent, and if it contains
> "spam-report.el", it'll just queue the report.

So this code in spam-report.el will have to change:

      (if spam-report-gmane-use-article-number
          (spam-report-url-ping 
           "spam.gmane.org"
           (format "/%s:%d"
                   (gnus-group-real-name gnus-newsgroup-name)
                   article))

or does it still work?  When I connected directly it seemed to be OK,
but I wasn't sure if you're rewriting properly or it's going to
/dev/null.

Hmmm, maybe I should also have a ham Gmane reporter!  I didn't know
you could "unspam."  Does it work with the
http://unspam.gmane.org/GROUP:ARTICLE format as you would expect?  I
tested and it looked OK, but same question as above...

Thanks
Ted