From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Subject: Re: mail splitting to another backend
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:42:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4nade9qh66.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3y91wvdog.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 27 Apr 2003 05:09:51 +0200")
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, larsi@gnus.org wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>
>> I don't know, I assumed that there was something magical about the
>> splitting environment that makes it imperative to use groups local
>> to the current server.
>
> The splitting process is kinda optimized -- if you were splitting
> naively to lots of groups, things would be a lot slower. (Writing
> .overview/active files repeatedly, etc.)
OK, so going back to my suggestion of a queue group - what's wrong
with the suggestion? Just put articles destined for a foreign group
in the queue group, and then move them out of the queue based on an
artificial header. It won't disturb anything in the splitting
process.
It seems like it would be pretty easy to implement, too.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-29 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 16:59 Ted Zlatanov
2003-04-17 18:56 ` Paul Jarc
2003-04-17 19:09 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-04-17 19:53 ` Paul Jarc
2003-04-17 19:41 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-04-17 20:22 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-04-17 20:31 ` Paul Jarc
2003-04-18 8:56 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-04-18 10:06 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-18 21:33 ` server parameter vs. server variable (was: mail splitting to another backend) Reiner Steib
2003-04-18 23:03 ` server parameter vs. server variable Paul Jarc
2003-04-20 14:35 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-20 15:11 ` Jesper Harder
2003-04-21 20:23 ` texinfo markup fixes (was: server parameter vs. server variable) Reiner Steib
2003-04-21 22:05 ` texinfo markup fixes Jesper Harder
2003-04-22 0:31 ` François Pinard
2003-04-22 0:36 ` Jesper Harder
2003-04-22 0:53 ` François Pinard
2003-04-18 17:12 ` mail splitting to another backend Ted Zlatanov
2003-04-18 22:48 ` Paul Jarc
2003-04-18 23:00 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-04-27 3:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-04-29 18:42 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2003-05-01 6:55 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4nade9qh66.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).