From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50054 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam-stat broken? Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:46:21 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nadh1k3wy.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nwukeiy3c.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nr8amfwem.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nfzqur9al.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nk7g6tvdf.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045057534 23622 80.91.224.249 (12 Feb 2003 13:45:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ixCd-00068T-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:45:31 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18ixEQ-0002nX-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:47:22 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:48:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA04879 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:48:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 14606 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2003 13:47:06 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14601 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2003 13:47:06 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 12 Feb 2003 13:47:06 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h1CDkej24506 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:46:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h1CDkLQ26818; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:46:21 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Niklas Morberg's message of "Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:49:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50054 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50054 On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, niklas.morberg@axis.com wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> Hm, I think I may have inadvertently fixed the problem :) > > The move routines seem to be working better now, but after > some more testing I still see the problem with non-existing > messages being displayed in the summary buffer by the agent. Can you check now? If there is still a problem, something is wrong in the interaction between the agent and gnus-summary-move-article. Ted