From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54902 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el: automatically resplitting ham in a spam group? Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:43:22 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nbrr3skqt.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nfzgkdqzx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nptfnjhbb.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4ny8ubyppq.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069566335 28248 80.91.224.253 (23 Nov 2003 05:45:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 05:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3442@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Nov 23 06:45:31 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ANn3r-0001a9-00 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 06:45:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ANn35-0007Ry-00; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:44:43 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ANn2x-0007Rs-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:44:35 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF0B3A0066 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:44:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hAN5hr704321; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:43:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hAN5hMm24589; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:43:22 -0500 (EST) Original-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=), ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=28L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly's?= message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:20:20 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54902 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54902 On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, lorentey@elte.hu wrote: > But if I understand it well, no message would be lost; they would > just reappear in the current group, and I think these users can > easily fix their configuration, or simply ignore the new respooling > feature. Adding a note to the documentation along the lines of 'to > prevent unexpected results, if you plan to use this feature, make > sure that your split rules are set up so that the last rule never > returns nil' would be enough, I guess. Well, don't forget that nnimap is buggy with respooling - I always see nil as the respool result, no matter what. I will leave things the way they are for now, and fix any obvious bugs but generally I'll leave further work in this direction until No Gnus. > (By the way: is it 'respool' or 'resplit'? I don't know the correct > terminology.) The respooling should invoke the splitting functions, thus resplitting the article :) > I have played with it for a while, and after adding the > no-spam-split-during-respool thingy, I think it does exactly what I > need. > > If you're interested, here is my change: (it's quite ugly, but > works) I didn't see this until I had done quite a bit of work on spam.el in a different direction, so I'm afraid your patch won't work cleanly. Can you check your patch against the mega-patch I'll be posting later tonight and see if there are any conflicts? Thanks! Ted