From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49671 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: planned spam.el features Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:20:13 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nbs22a202.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nr8b2wdwt.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87lm19q7bb.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043691569 22526 80.91.224.249 (27 Jan 2003 18:19:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ding Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dDqw-0005r5-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:19:27 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18dDs2-0005BK-00; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:20:34 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:21:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA13523 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:21:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 3255 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2003 18:20:17 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 3250 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2003 18:20:17 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2003 18:20:17 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h0RIKGW14174; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:20:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h0RIKD526491; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:20:13 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Stephen Zander X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Zander , Ding Mailing List In-Reply-To: <87lm19q7bb.fsf@pobox.com> (Stephen Zander's message of "Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:54:16 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49671 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49671 On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, gibreel@pobox.com wrote: >>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: > Ted> OK, now that spam.el is somewhat stable, I'm going to start > Ted> working on the next bunch of features: > > A simple request (unless it's already in the latest version). I use > fetchmail & mailagent to retrieve & split mail from various lists > into seperate files before reading it with Gnus. I now also run > bogofilter against all email prior to handing it to mailagent for > splitting. While I have spam-use-bogofilter set to t, this means > that bogofilter gets invoked with the wrong command line switches, > '-n' & '-s' instead of '-S' and '-N', because bogofilter has already > added the message to its database. > > If I write a small patch to allow for this alternative, would you be > willing to add it? Also, does anyone have a prefered name for the > variable that enables such switching? Sure, I'll take a look. Maybe spam-bogofilter-force-reclassify? The upcoming spam.el changes will track messages as they are processed as ham or spam. You will be able to force spam.el to recognize that a message has already been processed as spam/ham by a certain backend spam/ham processor, so force-reclassify will not be needed. These changes won't happen soon, though, so your patch would be literally a patch in the meanwhile :) Ted