From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62341 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: No Gnus 0.3 slower than Oort Gnus 0.24 spam handling Date: 21 Mar 2006 11:02:08 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nek0vdbwf.fsf@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142957010 10995 80.91.229.2 (21 Mar 2006 16:03:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Ding Mailing List" Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10868@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 21 17:03:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLjJt-0001Tk-AR for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:02:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FLjJp-0006UE-00; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:02:50 -0600 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FLjJF-0006U8-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:02:13 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FLjJD-0003hI-Fk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:02:13 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FLjJD-0004Kd-00 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:02:11 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 14258 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2006 15:55:01 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.54.119]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Mar 2006 15:55:01 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Ding Mailing List" Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:y77RaKcUvr9/b+ecVxyM8RCMXzg= In-Reply-To: (Alberto L.'s message of "Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:33:09 -0800") Posted-To: gnu.emacs.gnus X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62341 Archived-At: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gnu.emacs.gnus as well. On 17 Mar 2006, alberto.l@nospam.net wrote: > I recently upgraded from Oort 0.24 to No 0.30 and my spam handling has > become quite slow. Here is my situation: > > - I use nnfolder mail storage > my spam handling configuration (using bogofilter): > - splits spam into mail.spam.temp > - on exiting, spam in all groups is moved to mail.spam.save > - mail.spam.temp and mail.spam.save are spam groups > - the spam process destination for mail.spam.save is nil > > When I enter mail.spam.temp to check for false spam positives, on > quitting it all spam-marked messages are moved to mail.spam.save. > This is quite slower with No 0.30 w.r.t. Oort 0.24 because, > apparently, both mail.spam.temp and mail.spam.save are written to > disk each time a single message is moved. With Oort 0.24 as far as I > can understand both groups are written to disk only once. Alberto, thank you for the comments. Some people on the 'ding' mailing list (which is the main vehicle for Gnus development) have commented that nnfolder is much slower with CVS Emacs than with the older releases. Could this be part of the problem? Also, is it possible for you to use the CVS version of Gnus, so we can debug this problem against the latest version of spam.el? Thanks again Ted