From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/60997 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What's wrong with my spam.el settings now? Date: 21 Sep 2005 10:49:07 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nek7iiiho.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87mznufe09.fsf@lucien.dreaming> <4nmzm7k9jb.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d5n3y89s.fsf@lucien.dreaming> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127314516 2401 80.91.229.2 (21 Sep 2005 14:55:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9529@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 21 16:55:13 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EI5ux-0002QQ-66 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:49:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EI5us-00077z-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EI5uS-00077u-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EI5uR-0007uG-4j for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EI5uP-00066t-00 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:49:17 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 2255 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 14:44:24 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Sep 2005 14:44:23 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:050921:ding@gnus.org::ugI3ISAcwqPEfSxs:000008lS In-Reply-To: <87d5n3y89s.fsf@lucien.dreaming> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Lind?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?str=F6m's?= message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:10:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60997 Archived-At: On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, bkhl@elektrubadur.se wrote: > "Ted Zlatanov" writes: >> I see from your configuration that spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam is >> set. You should only get messages marked as spam once, when you enter >> the group and they are unseen. After that, they will be unread but >> not unseen, so they shouldn't be marked as spam again. To confirm, >> when you enter the second time, is there a dot (.) to the left of the >> spam-marked article in the summary line? If yes, Gnus is not saving >> the marks of the articles, that's why you see them marked as spam >> again. >=20 > Yes. Here's a typical line: >=20 > $. [ 2: ] =A2=D2=C2=CA=E8=A7=E0=A4=C3=D7=E8=CD=A7= =E0=CA=D5=C2=A7=B5=D4=B4=C3=B6=C2=B9=B5=EC If you see this on the second entry on an article that was already in the group on the first entry, try another experiment: mark an article with `!' in the summary buffer, then exit. If the ! mark persists, then the unread/unseen state is not preserved correctly, and we need to bug the maintainer of the nnml backend. If the ! mark does not persist, the marks are not preserved, and we'll still bug the maintainer :) Thanks for your patience. Ted