From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53485 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Need help with spam stuff. Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:34:15 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nfzkzvqq0.fsf@koz.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nhe5n4lur.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058801724 8422 80.91.224.249 (21 Jul 2003 15:35:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2029@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jul 21 17:35:21 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ecfg-00022m-00 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:33:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19ecgY-0002c1-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:34:46 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19ecgU-0002bw-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:34:42 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 74194 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2003 15:34:42 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 74189 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2003 15:34:42 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 21 Jul 2003 15:34:42 -0000 Original-Received: from koz.bwh.harvard.edu (koz [134.174.9.110]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h6LFYFH24394 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:34:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by koz.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h6LFYFX11589; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:34:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Xavier Maillard's message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:19:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53485 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53485 On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: > On 15 jui 2003, Ted Zlatanov spake thusly: >> ;; check SpamAssassin early >> (: spam-split 'spam-use-regex-headers) > > Hmmm, what is the list of the possible checkers here ? > >> ;; many irrelevant intermediate rules omitted >> >> (: spam-split) > > Why do you call spam-split again ? > >> ;; default mailbox >> "mail")) The first spam-split invocation targets specifically the spam-use-regex-headers check. If that check is turned on, spam-split will run it. You can use any number of spam-use-* checks here; I use regex-headers first for two reasons: so that spam sent to my mailing lists gets caught and because the regex-headers check is fast. The second call of spam-split will target all the enabled checks, including spam-use-regex-headers for a second time. Since it's a fast check, that doesn't bother me. The other checks I have, especially the blackholes check, would be too slow when run twice. This is in the manual as well, I think. Ted