From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50019 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam-stat broken? Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:56:02 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nfzqur9al.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nwukeiy3c.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nr8amfwem.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044986292 3699 80.91.224.249 (11 Feb 2003 17:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18iedn-0000oC-00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:56:19 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18ieeA-0005RQ-00; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:56:42 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:57:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA02435 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:57:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 27400 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2003 17:56:23 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 27395 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2003 17:56:23 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 11 Feb 2003 17:56:23 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h1BHuKj05609 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:56:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h1BHu2x10552; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:56:02 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Niklas Morberg's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:15:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50019 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50019 On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, niklas.morberg@axis.com wrote: > Niklas Morberg writes: > >> I'm afraid something else broke. Spam-stat hasn't caught a >> single spam for me lately. > > Sorry, I spoke too soon. It does seem to work, although more > spams than previously get through. I'm not sure how to fix that, but I'd guess your statistics database got skewed somehow. > OTOH I am having problems using the spam functionality with > the agent, but I haven't looked at it closely enough to > submit a proper problem description. It just feels a bit > shaky... I'll follow up in the other thread. > There's also the known problem of not being able to > automatically move more than one ham message out of the > spam group that is a bit annoying. I looked into that, and could not find anything wrong in spam.el's behavior (I'm pretty sure I posted a message to that effect to the ding list, asking for some help). I think the problem was with this code: (dolist (article articles) (when (and (memq (gnus-summary-article-mark article) ham-mark-values) (stringp group)) (let ((gnus-current-article article)) (gnus-summary-move-article nil group)))) in spam-ham-move-routine, but when I ran the routine interactively I could not figure out what was wrong. I'll look at it again, but I can't promise I'll do better this time :) Ted