From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51580 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mail splitting to another backend Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:09:52 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nhe8xdjpb.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nadepf4bp.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050606822 5398 80.91.224.249 (17 Apr 2003 19:13:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M124@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Apr 17 21:13:40 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 196El7-00014o-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 21:09:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 196Eli-0000V7-00; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:09:58 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 196Eld-0000Uc-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:09:53 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 52211 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2003 19:09:53 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 52206 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2003 19:09:53 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2003 19:09:53 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h3HJ9qI15613 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:09:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h3HJ9qU20069; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:09:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Ding Mailing List X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Ding Mailing List In-Reply-To: (Paul Jarc's message of "Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:56:06 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51580 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51580 On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, prj@po.cwru.edu wrote: > I think mail splitting really ought to be redone. It should be > controlled by Gnus proper rather than an individual select method. > (There's too much policy in backends generally.) Splitting to > multiple select methods would go naturally with that. OK, so multiple splitting is not in the near future? I'm OK with that, I just want to know so I can write the registry split-with-parent function. There's only two places where splitting is done, AFAIK: nnmail and nnimap splitting (regular and fancy). Ted