From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50455 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: (: spam-split) doesn't work Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:07:17 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nheaogwqi.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <87vfzyjx2v.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nisvxs1j6.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <874r7g2f4w.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nheb8qazq.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87vfznc21y.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nk7g3gdbk.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87vfzm7p2f.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nlm0iad77.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <877kc26j07.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <87el5talpw.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nfzq9k84r.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> <87wujl8tj8.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nwujlim0o.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> <87n0khcwty.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4n3cm9h27d.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> <87isv5crc0.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nlm01pdba.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> <87d6ldcmok.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nznogicec.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046452092 25197 80.91.224.249 (28 Feb 2003 17:08:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18onzQ-0006Xr-00 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:08:04 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18onz0-0005Pb-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:07:38 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:08:37 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA19874 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:08:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 53825 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2003 17:07:18 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 53820 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 17:07:18 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 17:07:18 -0000 Original-Received: from chubby.bwh.harvard.edu (chubby [134.174.9.50]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h1SH7Ij03676 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:07:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by chubby.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h1SH7Ia17602; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:07:18 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:55:47 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50455 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50455 On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, jas@extundo.com wrote: > The behaviour enabled by n-s-d-b for nnmail should be the default. > I think Gnus copies the message around, so (widen) should work. > Maybe putting (progn (widen) (message (buffer-string))) in the split > function will tell for sure, I haven't used nnmail splitting > recently. OK, I see. I thought that you did the (widen) by default before the splitting was invoked in nnml somewhere, my fault for not checking. So if the user has selected a statistical spam analyzer, I'm going to call (widen) in all cases, and additionally set nnimap-split-download-body to t when spam.el is loaded. I think that's sensible, so we avoid extra downloading when a spam splitter is invoked that doesn't care about the message body, e.g. BBDB or whitelists/blacklists. Would a user ever want to use a statistical analyzer on the message headers only? Should I add a setting for that? Thanks Ted