From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49811 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Some spam messages are not sorted into the corresponding group Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 14:15:04 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nhebjlux3.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <873cn85p1u.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <87adhf2ib2.fsf@splinter.inka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044386116 22686 80.91.224.249 (4 Feb 2003 19:15:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18g8XK-0005tl-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 20:15:14 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18g8Xe-0006NL-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:15:34 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:16:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA14717 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:16:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 4362 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 19:15:16 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 4357 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 19:15:16 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 19:15:16 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h14JFEW07270 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:15:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h14JF4g22767; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:15:04 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87adhf2ib2.fsf@splinter.inka.de> (Christopher Splinter's message of "Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:33:21 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49811 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49811 On Sun, 02 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> On Sat, 01 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote: >>> Some mails which are quite apparently spam (i. e. have spamicity >>> values of about 0.9952959048) are not sorted into the group they >>> should be sorted to. >>> >>> I use bogofilter as a mailfilter and (: spam-split) for >>> splitting. `S t' shows the proper spamicity. >>> >>> Is this a bug or am I doing anything wrong? >> >> Are you using spam-use-bogofilter-headers or spam-use-bogofilter? > > I use spam-use-bogofilter. Just to make sure: you do not pre-process mail with Bogofilter, right? It should come to you unmodified (without a X-Bogosity headers) if you have spam-use-bogofilter turned on. >> What does spam-check-bogofilter or spam-check-bogofilter-headers >> return when you run it in the article buffer? > > "junk" -- `B t' though returns this: > > (: spam-split) > "mail.misc" > > ("mail.misc" is not meant for spam.) > >> Can you show an example of a broken Bogofilter header? > > X-Bogosity: Spam, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=1.0000000000, > version=0.10.1.3.cvs.20030130 I get the correct output on that. Could something else in your split methods be matching? Can you show your split methods? Also, can you hit `t' on that article to show the whole body, then `M-: (spam-split)' to see what spam-split thinks about the message? Thanks Ted