From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61307 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Slow expiry with nnimap+Courier [patch] Date: 4 Nov 2005 11:06:16 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nirv8xurr.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <29ll0gpi1k.fsf@itl-pc9.hut.fi> <4nd5lkgj5v.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131120938 20855 80.91.229.2 (4 Nov 2005 16:15:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Jouni K Seppanen" , ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9839@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Nov 04 17:15:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EY49s-0005Mq-LN for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:11:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EY49l-0005s5-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:11:09 -0600 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EY45G-0005s0-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:30 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EY45C-00046L-D6 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:29 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EY456-0000j2-00 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:06:21 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 22997 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2005 16:00:59 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: jas@extundo.com, jks@iki.fi, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Nov 2005 16:00:58 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Simon Josefsson" , "Jouni K Seppanen " , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Simon Josefsson" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:051104:ding@gnus.org::xyz305ZtHyA5en2b:00000d77 X-Hashcash: 1:20:051104:jks@iki.fi::ktdeddzl7ikaU+eM:00000002fMV X-Hashcash: 1:20:051104:jas@extundo.com::zRfbMQV5TYIMiRMN:005Afv In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:22:06 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61307 Archived-At: On 2 Nov 2005, jas@extundo.com wrote: > "Ted Zlatanov" writes: > >> On 26 Oct 2005, jks@iki.fi wrote: >> >>> So it seems that Courier is doing something very suboptimal with the >>> Gnus command. The attached patch (against 5.10.6) seems to have >>> helped: now exiting the INBOX summary takes something like 2 seconds >>> instead of the previous 30. >> >> Is there any reason why the faster behavior should not be the default? >> Is it slower on non-Courier servers? > > Yes, it may generate more network traffic, and may require servers to > search more messages for flag changes too. Can we set it on automatically if the server tells us it's a Courier server? Mine does in the first OK response, right after connecting. Ted