From: "Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: No Gnus doesn't like the obsolete spam syntax
Date: 20 Sep 2005 12:13:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4nirwvk99d.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874q9yy02n.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:53:20 -0700")
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005, rra@stanford.edu wrote:
> Just a quick note in case it saves someone else some time.
>
> I used to have:
>
> (custom-set-variables
> '(gnus-parameters
> '(("^nnml:spam\\..*"
> (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)
> (spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
> gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))))))
>
> (with more gnus-parameters, but that's the relevant ones). This no longer
> works with No Gnus (version in the headers). I'm not entirely sure why,
> but following the manual's instructions and then fiddling a little to
> figure out what they really mean, the following *does* work:
>
> (custom-set-variables
> '(gnus-parameters
> '(("^nnml:spam\\..*"
> (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)
> (spam-process ((spam spam-use-bogofilter)
> (ham spam-use-bogofilter)))))))
>
> It took me a little bit to get the syntax right, since for some reason I
> read the manual suggestion and thought it said to replace
>
> gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
>
> with
>
> ('(spam spam-use-bogofilter))
>
> literally. That just silently fails with no error message, apparently due
> to having one too many layers of parens.
Yeah... I wasn't sure about changing to the new style of
configuration for exactly this reason - backwards compatibility. I
think the pain is worth it, though, as the new format is much better
IMO.
Was the manual misleading in any way? I'll be glad to fix it.
> (Yes, I know you can do this all inside customize. I hate the interface
> for customize and also prefer to have commented configurations so that I
> can remember why I changed something, which means that I do a lot of
> writing code based directly on the manual or using customize to generate a
> first draft and then tweaking it.)
I'm ambivalent on this issue. It's nice to customize, and for spam.el
stuff it's almost required, but on the other hand I like everything in
my gnus.el... Of course, don't forget that Gnus has three ways to set
group variables, through gnus-parameters, individual global variables,
and group/topic parameters... It's insane IMHO. I would prefer to
pick one (group/topic parameters are best I think) and provide
conversion functions from the others to it. But anyhow :)
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-20 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-10 2:53 Russ Allbery
2005-09-20 16:13 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2005-09-20 17:26 ` Russ Allbery
2005-09-21 14:28 ` Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4nirwvk99d.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).