From: "Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: spam.el: unmark ham when processed
Date: 26 May 2004 12:02:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4nisejjhwk.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861xl7i7yj.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> (Kai Grossjohann's message of "Wed, 26 May 2004 16:22:44 +0200")
On Wed, 26 May 2004, kai@emptydomain.de wrote:
> I enter nnml:spam. I see a ham message in there. I hit u. I hit
> q. Said spam is processed and respooled, but it is still ticked.
>
> Can spam.el auto-untick the message (and perhaps even mark it as
> new/unseen) when it processes and respools it?
>
> Or should I hit M-u instead of u?
How about setting spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group?
Does that help?
Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-26 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-26 14:22 Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-26 16:02 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4nisejjhwk.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).