From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56330 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [spam-report.el] Offline Gmane spam reporting Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:51:07 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nisigasec.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4n7jz51bv8.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nr7x9uv4o.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1076359996 9812 80.91.224.253 (9 Feb 2004 20:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 20:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: ding-owner+M4870@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Feb 09 21:53:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AqIOy-0005yy-00 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:53:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AqIOb-0000Cz-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:52:45 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AqIOX-0000Cu-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:52:41 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D9F3A0260; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:52:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from collins.bwh.harvard.edu (collins [134.174.9.80]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i19KpHU13901; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:51:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from collins.bwh.harvard.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by collins.bwh.harvard.edu (8.12.9+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i19Kp7vl024225; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:51:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by collins.bwh.harvard.edu (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id i19Kp7kh024222; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:51:07 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:07:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56330 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56330 On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, 4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de wrote: > BTW: `spam-report-process-queue' calls > `spam-report-url-ping-function' for each report, i.e. when using > `spam-report-url-ping-plain', we do (open-network-stream ...) for > each report. If we always (or often) have the same host, we could > spare some overhead by sending multiple "GET"s in one connection. > But I don't know if the performance gain is worth the effort. I don't think that makes much of a difference, the big overhead is on the Gmane server where the request is parsed. Maybe if Lars gives us an interface for submitting a lot of spam reports at once... I can actually see why Lars *wouldn't* make it easy to submit lots of spam reports at once. It would make it easier to maliciously submit lots of false spam reports. I don't know if that's a concern, but I thought of it :) > If it gets more complicated, I would suggest to define named > functions, because then users may benefit of improvements without > having to edit the lambdas. Please install what you have in mind > (I'm not sure how you intend to preserve the values and I'm not > familiar with the agent). I added the code to spam-report.el, see what you think. I make special exceptions for users that always report to a file anyway. Thanks Ted