Re: ham training and gnus-expirable-mark

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

> Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com> writes:

> > 2) In a spam group, how do I mark ham so that it can be sent for training?  I
> >    have specified both spam and ham processors, I removed the gnus-spam-mark
> >    and replace it with a gnus-del-mark but that does not seem to do the
> >    trick.  Did I miss something or (as I think the manual implies) is this
> >    not possible?  If not, I guess the only thing to do is to specify a ham
> >    group for the non-spam contents so that it can get moved over and then
> >    trained?

> I had exactly the same difficulty:

> C-h v spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups

Also spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups could be useful to some.

> Ted, maybe this should default to t?  

I think that's a good idea.  spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups should
still be nil though.  Anyone against?

Ted