On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, seh@panix.com wrote:

> "Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> 
>> I don't use XEmacs, so thanks for catching that.  Can I get your
>> changes as a patch?  If it's trivial don't worry about it.
> 
> It's just that one function name swap: `make-temp-name' rather than
> `make-temp-file'. I'm not sure how you'd prefer to make that
> conditional.

According to the Emacs docs you should use make-temp-file for safety,
but I'll go with make-temp-name for simplicity because I don't expect
the risk from it to be significant (I remove the temp file afterwards
in any case).  If anyone disagrees, let me know.

>> I just wanted you to test the gnus-encrypt.el functions on their own
>> and see if they work reliably for you.
> 
> So far I've just tested them using gpg with AES, and the
> encrypt/decrypt functions work mostly as expected. I'm not sure why
> the "current buffer" can't be read-only when calling
> `gnus-encrypt-write-file-contents', though:

I've changed the code to do the right thing, I think (at the expense
of passing around potentially large buffer substrings, but I expect
this code to be used for small files).  Can you test it again
please?  Once we're both OK with the code, I'll add the netrc.el hooks.

Thanks
Ted