From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:44:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4nk70y46mm.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8765cigujt.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> (Adam =?iso-8859-1?q?Sj=F8gren's?= message of "Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:26:46 +0200")
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, asjo@koldfront.dk wrote:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:06:04 -0500, Ted wrote:
>> Set a ham-mark (usually the tick mark) on the message. The ham
>> message, when you quit the group, will be moved to the
>> ham-process-destination (which can be multiple groups) and
>> processed with the ham exit processor.
>
> This I can't get working (see my previous email with my complete
> setup described).
Like I said, it looks correct to me, can you trace the
spam-ham-copy-or-move-routine function?
>> Why would you NOT want to expire spam?
>
> I want to keep all email I get - if nothing else for statistical
> purposes. (And if some filter turns out to be really, really good
> when trained with a billion spam-messages, I'll be ready!)
Then you can just move all spam to a spam group and set it to never
run the expiry process, no? If you insist on keeping the spam in the
original group I guess I can make that mark configurable... It just
seems like very few people would find it useful, and spam.el has too
many options already.
I find little value in keeping old spam, personally. Old ham is very
valuable, but old spam tends to lose value with time.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 20:54 Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-02 6:22 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-02 16:04 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 13:28 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-03 14:01 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-05 13:21 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-02 16:06 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-02 17:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-03 21:10 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 21:19 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 21:48 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 21:58 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 13:29 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-03 13:49 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-06 8:12 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-06 21:40 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-02 16:10 ` Jody Klymak
2004-04-02 17:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-02 17:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-02 17:26 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-02 17:44 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2004-04-03 14:22 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 14:24 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 23:59 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-04 1:59 ` Jesper Harder
2004-04-04 13:07 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-05 13:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-05 15:50 ` Jesper Harder
2004-04-06 21:36 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-05-20 18:39 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-20 19:19 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-05-22 23:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2004-05-23 13:44 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-05-26 16:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-26 20:30 ` Adam Sjøgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4nk70y46mm.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).