From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56887 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:44:17 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nk70y46mm.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87isgjpggh.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> <4n65ci5myr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8765cigujt.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080928747 24137 80.91.224.253 (2 Apr 2004 17:59:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5426@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Apr 02 19:58:55 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B9SwQ-00007u-00 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:58:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B9Sw5-0001ua-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:58:33 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B9Svx-0001uU-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:58:25 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B9Svx-0002RI-65 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:58:25 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6875A3A0043 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:58:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from asimov (asimov [134.174.9.63]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i32HuPl13021; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:56:26 -0500 (EST) Original-To: asjo@koldfront.dk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Adam_Sj=F8gren?=) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: asjo@koldfront.dk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Adam_Sj=F8gren?=), ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <8765cigujt.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> (Adam =?iso-8859-1?q?Sj=F8gren's?= message of "Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:26:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56887 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56887 On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, asjo@koldfront.dk wrote: On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:06:04 -0500, Ted wrote: >> Set a ham-mark (usually the tick mark) on the message. The ham >> message, when you quit the group, will be moved to the >> ham-process-destination (which can be multiple groups) and >> processed with the ham exit processor. > > This I can't get working (see my previous email with my complete > setup described). Like I said, it looks correct to me, can you trace the spam-ham-copy-or-move-routine function? >> Why would you NOT want to expire spam? > > I want to keep all email I get - if nothing else for statistical > purposes. (And if some filter turns out to be really, really good > when trained with a billion spam-messages, I'll be ready!) Then you can just move all spam to a spam group and set it to never run the expiry process, no? If you insist on keeping the spam in the original group I guess I can make that mark configurable... It just seems like very few people would find it useful, and spam.el has too many options already. I find little value in keeping old spam, personally. Old ham is very valuable, but old spam tends to lose value with time. Ted