From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50036 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam-stat broken? Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:28:28 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nk7g6tvdf.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nwukeiy3c.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nr8amfwem.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nfzqur9al.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044995312 18708 80.91.224.249 (11 Feb 2003 20:28:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ih11-0004qr-00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:28:27 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18ih1d-0007Sc-00; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:29:05 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:30:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA03000 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:29:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 35099 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2003 20:28:48 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 35094 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2003 20:28:48 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 11 Feb 2003 20:28:48 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h1BKSkj09593 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:28:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h1BKSSl11321; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:28:28 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <4nfzqur9al.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:56:02 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50036 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50036 On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, tzz@lifelogs.com wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, niklas.morberg@axis.com wrote: >> There's also the known problem of not being able to >> automatically move more than one ham message out of the >> spam group that is a bit annoying. > > I looked into that, and could not find anything wrong in spam.el's > behavior (I'm pretty sure I posted a message to that effect to the > ding list, asking for some help). I think the problem was with this > code: Hm, I think I may have inadvertently fixed the problem :) I'm not sure if it's the right way to do it, but I now set the process-mark on every article that is to be moved, and then call gnus-summary-move-article. It seems to work in my testing. Ted