Re: spam/ham exit processors

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, rra@stanford.edu wrote:

> Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de> writes:
> 
>> Oh!  Does this mean that people could set
>> gnus-spam-process-destinations to nnml:spam, say, then set the
>> spam-process parameter just on nnml:spam, for it to be added to the
>> blacklist or whatever?  (Whereas spam-process remains unset/nil in
>> all other groups except nnml:spam?)
> 
> When I tried to do that, I discovered that I had to look at all of
> the spam twice in order to get it registered.

I'm not sure what you mean by "look at" and "registered" - can you
clarify the process and where the bug/problem was?

Thanks
Ted