From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54647
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: spam/ham exit processors
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:26:42 -0500
Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @
 Cienfuegos
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <4nllqx16ul.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
References: <76ekwpy35x.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com>
	<4nllqx47mx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
	<87ptg9ryb2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de>
	<87vfq15h3o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067894865 9232 80.91.224.253 (3 Nov 2003 21:27:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:27:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3188=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 03 22:27:42 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M3188=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AGmEg-0004xz-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:27:42 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AGmEf-00053J-05
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:27:41 -0600
Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AGmEa-00053C-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:27:36 -0600
Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41])
	by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7413A004F
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon,  3 Nov 2003 15:27:36 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133])
	by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hA3LR6719967;
	Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:27:06 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost)
	by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hA3LQgN03295;
	Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:26:42 -0500 (EST)
Original-To: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx"
Mail-Followup-To: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>, ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <87vfq15h3o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message
 of "Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:31:39 -0800")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54647
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54647

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, rra@stanford.edu wrote:

> Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de> writes:
> 
>> Oh!  Does this mean that people could set
>> gnus-spam-process-destinations to nnml:spam, say, then set the
>> spam-process parameter just on nnml:spam, for it to be added to the
>> blacklist or whatever?  (Whereas spam-process remains unset/nil in
>> all other groups except nnml:spam?)
> 
> When I tried to do that, I discovered that I had to look at all of
> the spam twice in order to get it registered.

I'm not sure what you mean by "look at" and "registered" - can you
clarify the process and where the bug/problem was?

Thanks
Ted