* spam-use-pgp-signed?
@ 2006-02-09 20:31 Uwe Brauer
2006-02-13 19:27 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Brauer @ 2006-02-09 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello
While it is posible to set the spam splitting method such that it
detects hashcash, via spam-use-hashcash, there seems to exist no tool
for pgp-signed-message. Is this correct?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: spam-use-pgp-signed?
2006-02-09 20:31 spam-use-pgp-signed? Uwe Brauer
@ 2006-02-13 19:27 ` Ted Zlatanov
2006-02-15 14:35 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Uwe Brauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2006-02-13 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On 9 Feb 2006, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote:
> While it is posible to set the spam splitting method such that it
> detects hashcash, via spam-use-hashcash, there seems to exist no tool
> for pgp-signed-message. Is this correct?
Not currently, but if it's a function that can be run on a message
buffer, it will work. I just need:
a) the function (or just a regexp match)
b) whether it needs just the headers or the whole message
(I'm guessing the whole message, which will make it a bit slow)
I don't use PGP signing myself, so I don't know where to start with
(a), sorry...
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: spam-use-pgp-signed?
2006-02-13 19:27 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Ted Zlatanov
@ 2006-02-15 14:35 ` Uwe Brauer
2006-03-20 19:48 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Brauer @ 2006-02-15 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
Ted> On 9 Feb 2006, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote:
>> While it is posible to set the spam splitting method such that it
>> detects hashcash, via spam-use-hashcash, there seems to exist no tool
>> for pgp-signed-message. Is this correct?
Ted> Not currently, but if it's a function that can be run on a message
Ted> buffer, it will work. I just need:
Ted> a) the function (or just a regexp match)
Ted> b) whether it needs just the headers or the whole message
Ted> (I'm guessing the whole message, which will make it a bit slow)
Ted> I don't use PGP signing myself, so I don't know where to start with
Ted> (a), sorry...
Ted> Ted
hm,
May be I am wrong, but I think there is a difference between mailcrypt
for pgp and the gnu support for gpg. While the former signs messages
inline the letter uses mime. So may be the following cheap trick might
do
(setq
nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy
nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX"
nnimap-split-fancy
`(| ;macro
("Content-Type" "multipart/signed" "SPAM.HAM")))
Uwe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: spam-use-pgp-signed?
2006-02-15 14:35 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Uwe Brauer
@ 2006-03-20 19:48 ` Ted Zlatanov
2006-03-22 17:07 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Uwe Brauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2006-03-20 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On 15 Feb 2006, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote:
> May be I am wrong, but I think there is a difference between mailcrypt
> for pgp and the gnu support for gpg. While the former signs messages
> inline the letter uses mime. So may be the following cheap trick might
> do
> (setq
> nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy
> nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX"
> nnimap-split-fancy
> `(| ;macro
> ("Content-Type" "multipart/signed" "SPAM.HAM")))
Since this is a header, it's a fast check I can do as a spam filter,
if anyone is interested. Hooking it into the spam.el framework means
that, basically, the last line above will become
(setq spam-use-signed-check t) ;; or something like that
and then you just call (: spam-split) as usual. If you or anyone else
wants it, I'll add the functionality. It's pretty simple.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: spam-use-pgp-signed?
2006-03-20 19:48 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Ted Zlatanov
@ 2006-03-22 17:07 ` Uwe Brauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Brauer @ 2006-03-22 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
Ted> On 15 Feb 2006, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote:
>> May be I am wrong, but I think there is a difference between mailcrypt
>> for pgp and the gnu support for gpg. While the former signs messages
>> inline the letter uses mime. So may be the following cheap trick might
>> do
>> (setq
>> nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy
>> nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX"
>> nnimap-split-fancy
>> `(| ;macro
>> ("Content-Type" "multipart/signed" "SPAM.HAM")))
Ted> Since this is a header, it's a fast check I can do as a spam filter,
Ted> if anyone is interested. Hooking it into the spam.el framework means
Ted> that, basically, the last line above will become
Ted> (setq spam-use-signed-check t) ;; or something like that
I think it would be nice. But there is a however. I just tested the
setting with gnus and mozilla-thunderbird, and 3 smtp server: my
university server, gmail and gmx.net. That is I sent a message to myself which
I signed pgp mime.
- My university server does not not chance the header and the
above setting would work.
- Gmail however produces the following header
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:t
o:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
b=UQVmgpAvZMgBNilVC6jL3nU/UK+s/0Q0I4bMqo0fMedsguRm+vGvV1+rAc2djkQSsLsFU/agS
JwEwzSgQ6gA+Uk8g8aiS9lz6d0r5TbnHNOloUC1gC/ig6Dyj7Juze5pjcmBqU9sVYyRWIgAz+2K
LkImPJ1DR+sM5GAbWfIYWHo=
- Gmx even changed the content-type to
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
So I am not sure what is the best strategy. May be to include all of
these headers?
Uwe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-22 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-09 20:31 spam-use-pgp-signed? Uwe Brauer
2006-02-13 19:27 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Ted Zlatanov
2006-02-15 14:35 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Uwe Brauer
2006-03-20 19:48 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Ted Zlatanov
2006-03-22 17:07 ` spam-use-pgp-signed? Uwe Brauer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).